Islamic Radical Groups Gaining Legitimacy
Radical groups like the Taliban and HTS in Syria, once seen as enemies, gain legitimacy after seizing power.
The world initially opposes them, but diplomatic efforts follow to engage them after they come to power.
Such groups gain global recognition, even if their past actions have been violent or extremist.
The shift in global response is largely driven by a desire to avoid further conflict or instability.
Taliban's Rise and Global Response
The U.S. and other countries cooperated with the Taliban, hoping to shift their stance on terrorism and women’s rights, but these promises were not kept.
The UNSC allowed the Taliban to access donor funds, despite their lack of accountability and failure to uphold commitments.
India, during its UNSC presidency, made sure that the resolution included strong references to preventing terrorist activities emanating from Afghanistan.
Despite Taliban abuses, the international community chose to engage diplomatically, prioritizing pragmatic political goals over human rights.
Syria and Bangladesh - Growing Concerns
In Syria, al-Jolani’s HTS, formerly al-Qaeda-linked, is now in power, with the U.S. removing a bounty on him, signaling tacit approval.
Radical Islamic groups like HTS gain ground in regions of conflict, emboldened by international acquiescence.
In Bangladesh, radical groups like Jamaat-e-Islami and Ansarullah Bangla Team have exploited political turmoil to rise again.
These groups are targeting minority communities and engaging in anti-India rhetoric, which could destabilize the region.
India's Strategic Position and Concerns
India has supported democratic processes in Bangladesh, but the rise of radicalism threatens the stability India helped foster.
The U.S. appears to be backing a military-led government in Bangladesh, which tolerates radical groups, risking increased instability.
India must maintain a delicate balance between supporting Bangladesh’s democracy and safeguarding its own security interests.
India’s historical support during Bangladesh’s early years of democracy highlights the importance of continued engagement, even as radical groups rise.
COMMENTS