The Right to Education Act (RTE) and its no-detention policy have undergone significant changes with the Union government’s recent amendment of the Rules.
This change marks a shift from the original vision of the RTE Act, aiming to address the learning gaps that have become evident in recent years.
The Original No-Detention Policy: Rationale and Challenges
Purpose: The no-detention policy, as outlined in the 2009 RTE Act, aimed to create a pressure-free environment for students in Classes 1-8, ensuring learning continuity without fear of failure or expulsion.
Many schools conflated no-detention with no-assessment, leading to automatic promotion without evaluating whether students met grade-specific learning outcomes.
Efforts to implement Continuous and Comprehensive Evaluation (CCE) were hindered by insufficient resources, teacher training, and institutional apathy.
Teachers often resorted to mass-filling assessment forms without conducting actual evaluations.
Evidence of Decline:
ASER Reports (2018-2023): Declines in basic reading and arithmetic skills among Class 5 students and significant foundational learning deficits in youth aged 14-18.
National Achievement Survey (NAS) 2021: Progressive declines in student performance from Class 3 to Class 8 in both language and mathematics.
Class 10 and 12 Board Exams: High failure rates in 2023, with over 65 lakh students failing across 59 boards.
Exacerbation by COVID-19: The pandemic intensified existing challenges, further widening the learning gap.
2024 Amendment: Key Changes
Students in Classes 5 and 8 who fail to meet promotion criteria after the year-end exam can be detained.
A second-chance re-examination will be conducted after two months of remedial teaching.
The amendment includes schools run by the Central government, such as Kendriya Vidyalayas and Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalayas.
Criticisms of the Amendment
Critics argue that detention punishes children for systemic failures, such as inadequate teaching and resource allocation.
There are calls to hold teachers responsible for poor learning outcomes through rigorous appraisals and incentives for inclusive teaching practices.
Proposed Way Forward
Conduct assessments at the school level in every class, enabling timely identification of learning gaps.
Move away from reliance on high-stakes year-end exams.
Implement rigorous teacher appraisals, linking performance to learning outcomes.
Provide professional development and support for teachers to adopt inclusive teaching strategies.
Focus on timely remedial interventions to address learning gaps before they escalate.
Equip schools with resources for continuous monitoring and targeted support for struggling students.
Revive and refine the Continuous and Comprehensive Evaluation system with adequate training for teachers.
Ensure a balanced approach to formative and summative assessments.
Reward teachers and schools that demonstrate improvement in learning outcomes, particularly among disadvantaged students.
Conclusion
The rollback of the no-detention policy reflects an evidence-based response to India’s learning crisis.
However, to ensure lasting improvements, reforms must go beyond punitive measures.
By focusing on teacher accountability, inclusive teaching, and regular assessments, the education system can better address the learning needs of all students and achieve the broader goals of the RTE Act.
COMMENTS