Concerns Over Draft UGC Regulations 2025
Reservations have been raised about the method of Vice-Chancellor (V-C) appointments and the broadening of experience criteria.
Issues stem from the need to balance dynamic federal polity with legal precedents set by the Supreme Court of India.
The 2025 regulations have sparked debate over the involvement of the State executive in the selection process.
Reduced Role for State Executives in V-C Selection
Supreme Court rulings have minimized the State’s role in V-C appointments, specifically in search-cum-selection committees.
The Court emphasized that any State executive involvement would invalidate the appointment process.
The draft regulations now restrict selection committees to highly qualified individuals nominated by the Chancellor and UGC.
Despite this, States argue their important role in funding and guiding regional development, which should be considered in V-C selection.
Broadening V-C Experience Criteria
The draft regulations propose broadening the qualifications for V-Cs to include experience in public policy, industry, and other sectors, not just academia.
The 2010-2018 UGC regulations were more restrictive, focusing on teaching experience; the new regulations aim to open the pool to diverse expertise.
The new approach aligns with international norms where V-Cs are expected to have broader leadership and networking skills.
The change seeks to address the evolving needs of Indian universities and their role in innovation and growth.
Potential Solutions and Future Outlook
A potential compromise includes allowing a State nominee in the selection process, provided they meet specific independent criteria to avoid political influence.
Emphasis is placed on ensuring the neutrality and impartiality of the V-C selection process, maintaining independence from both State and central executive pressures.
The UGC’s proposal to widen the pool for V-C candidates aligns with global trends towards more dynamic leadership in universities.
The university community is urged to support this change to foster a more innovative, business-like, and forward-thinking higher education system.
COMMENTS