The New Income Tax Law: Simplification, Reforms, and Privacy Concerns
UPSC Relevance
Prelims: Indian Economy (Taxation, Direct Taxes, Tax Reforms), Indian Polity & Governance (Fundamental Rights - Article 21, Right to Privacy, Parliamentary Committees).
Mains:
GS Paper 3: Indian Economy and issues relating to mobilization of resources, growth (Taxation); Government Budgeting.
GS Paper 2: Government policies and interventions for development in various sectors; Parliament and its functioning; Fundamental Rights.
GS Paper 4 (Ethics): Ethical concerns in governance (balancing state power and individual rights).
Key Highlights from the News
Detailed Explanation of Concepts
This topic directly relates to tax reforms and fundamental rights in India:
Direct Tax Reform in India:
The 1961 Act is outdated and complex. There has been a long-standing demand for a new Direct Tax Code (DTC) to simplify it. This new bill is a major step in that direction.
The main objectives are to simplify the law, reduce litigation, and encourage tax compliance.
Parliamentary Select Committee:
This is an ad hoc committee formed to examine a specific bill in detail.
Its members are MPs from that house. Its report is only a recommendation, which the government can accept or reject.
Key Taxpayer-Friendly Provisions:
Updated Returns: This system allows taxpayers to voluntarily correct errors in their original returns within a specified period (here, four years). This encourages voluntary compliance.
Reopening of Assessment: The tax department has the authority to re-examine old cases if there is suspicion of suppressed income. Limiting this period to five years provides more certainty for taxpayers.
Conflict with Right to Privacy:
Puttaswamy Judgment (2017): The Supreme Court, in this judgment, declared the Right to Privacy as a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution, as part of the right to life.
While tax collection is a legitimate objective of the government, the means used for it must be "proportional." There should not be excessive intrusion into privacy.
The new power to demand and override all personal passwords is disproportionate and may be challenged in court as a violation of fundamental rights.

COMMENTS