The Firecracker Ban Debate: Supreme Court Pivots to a 'Balanced Approach'
UPSC Relevance
Prelims: Environment (Air Pollution, Green Crackers); Indian Polity and Governance (Judiciary, Fundamental Rights - Article 19(1)(g) & Article 21); Science & Technology bodies (NEERI, PESO).
Mains:
General Studies Paper 2 (Polity & Governance): Judiciary; Government policies and interventions.
General Studies Paper 3 (Environment): Environmental pollution and degradation. The "Environment vs. Livelihood" debate is a classic Mains theme.
Essay: Topics on Environment vs. Development.
Key Highlights from the News
Supreme Court's Shifting Stance on Firecracker Ban: The Supreme Court has moved from advocating a nationwide ban to a "balanced approach."
Impracticality of Complete Ban: The court observed that a complete ban on firecrackers is impractical, as it could lead to the growth of an illegal market and the emergence of mafias.
Need for a Balanced Policy: Instead of a mere prohibition, a policy is required that equally considers the right to earn a livelihood and the right to a clean environment.
Consultation with Stakeholders: The court directed the central Environment Ministry to consult with all parties, including firecracker manufacturers, to find a practical solution.
Interim Permission for Green Crackers: Manufacturers of NEERI and PESO-approved green crackers were temporarily allowed to continue operations, on the assurance that they would not sell in prohibited areas.
COMMENTS