Article 370 Judgment UPSC NOTE

 Federalism and constitutional sovereignty

  • The monism that is reflected in the judgment imagines the Union Constitution as the sole bearer of internal and external sovereignty.

  • Article 370 laid down an elaborate framework for the distribution of powers and authority between the Union and the State governments.

  • This was affirmed by the J&K Constituent Assembly and not just as an interim measure pending total integration

  • The sovereignty of the State resides in the people thereof and shall except in regard to matters specifically entrusted to the Union be exercised

on their behalf by the various organs of the State.

  • The State’s legislature will have powers to make laws for the State in respect of all matters falling within the sphere of its residuary sovereignty’.

  • By focusing more on the particular concept of sovereignty ‘which requires no subordination to another body’, the Court ends up refusing to recognise the shared sovereignty model of Article 370

  • Sovereignty in federal constitutions is not a binary concept restricted to a simple ‘is’ or ‘isn’t’ classification

The contingency of the presidential power 

  • Another site where the Court’s monism operates is in its reading of Clause 3 of Article 370

  • The Court rejects the argument that Article 370 had gained permanence after the dissolution of the Constituent Assembly as this ‘is premised on the understanding that the constitutional body had unbridled power to alter the constitutional integration of the State with the Union’. 

  • The Court also relies on Clause 3 to hold that Clause 1 could be operated without the concurrence of the State government since ‘the effect of applying all the provisions of the

Constitution to Jammu and Kashmir through the exercise of power under Article 370(1)(d) is the same as issuing a notification under Article 370(3)’.

  • In a constitutional democracy, no body or institution has unbridled powers

  • Clause 3 of Article 370 is primarily concerned with the relationship of two powers and not just the status or the relationship of the power-bearing entities. 

  • The proviso to Clause 3 makes it clear that the presidential power to abrogate Article 370 was contingent on the recommendation of the Constituent Assembly.

  • As it is in the nature of the presidential powers under Clause 3 to be contingent on the Constituent Assembly, this limitation does not die with the dissolution of the Assembly

  • The relation of powers here does not mean that the President becomes ‘subordinate’ to the Constituent Assembly but that power as a federal arrangement has been distributed across multiple axes under Article 370. 

  • The interpretation of Clause 1 that the Court offers is based on syllogistic reasoning but one that collapses the question of the nature of powers into the question of the effect of powers.

  • Holding that the President has the untrammelled power to abrogate Article 370 and order a total application of the Indian Constitution to the State to the effect that the State’s Constitution becomes inoperative is an ‘unbridled power’ that defies the logic of federalism and constitutional democracy.

State’s views on its future 

  • The judgment’s monism imagines popular sovereignty as a monolith where since the views of an individual State for the purposes of reorganisation are not binding on Parliament.

  • Justice Sanjay Kaul holds that ‘views are to be taken from the entire nation via the Parliament, as the issue leading to the reorganisation affects the nation as a whole’.

  • There are many sites within the Constitution where a recommendatory power is vested in a body. 

  • Merely because that power may not be binding does not mean that the power can be taken over by another body or that power need not be exercised because at its heart lies the question of agency. 

  • The inevitable conclusion that one arrives at is that the popular sovereignty of a State’s

people vis-à-vis the State becomes subordinate to the popular sovereignty of the entire nation vis-à-vis the Union as well as the States. 

  • This is particularly worrying in the context of J&K where the threshold for reorganising the State was historically much higher compared to the other States.

  • By relying on a monist reading of the Constitution, in a context that defies monism, the Court has not only upheld the abrogation of Article 370 but has also put its stamp of approval on the silencing, and rendering inconsequential, of the voice of the people of the former State of J&K.



Amritsar,1,Art & Culture,1,August 2023,251,Courses,7,Daily Current Affairs,48,December 2023,189,Disaster Management,2,Environment and Ecology,54,February 2024,188,Foundation Course,1,GDP,1,GEMS Club,1,GEMS Plus,1,Geography,67,Govt Schemes,2,GST,1,History,2,Home,3,IAS Booklist,1,Important News,71,Indian Economy,46,Indian History,2,Indian Polity,56,International Organisation,12,International Relations,58,Invasive Plant,1,January 2024,240,July 2023,281,June 2022,6,June 2023,268,May 2022,17,Mentorship,2,November 2023,169,October 2023,203,Places in News,2,Science & Technology,66,September 2023,205,UPSC CSE,111,
Learnerz IAS | Concept oriented UPSC Classes in Malayalam: Article 370 Judgment UPSC NOTE
Article 370 Judgment UPSC NOTE
Learnerz IAS | Concept oriented UPSC Classes in Malayalam
Loaded All Posts Not found any posts VIEW ALL Readmore Reply Cancel reply Delete By Home PAGES POSTS View All RECOMMENDED FOR YOU LABEL ARCHIVE SEARCH ALL POSTS Not found any post match with your request Back Home Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat January February March April May June July August September October November December Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec just now 1 minute ago $$1$$ minutes ago 1 hour ago $$1$$ hours ago Yesterday $$1$$ days ago $$1$$ weeks ago more than 5 weeks ago Followers Follow THIS PREMIUM CONTENT IS LOCKED STEP 1: Share to a social network STEP 2: Click the link on your social network Copy All Code Select All Code All codes were copied to your clipboard Can not copy the codes / texts, please press [CTRL]+[C] (or CMD+C with Mac) to copy Table of Content