States ruled by non-BJP parties (Kerala, Tamil Nadu, Telangana, Karnataka) oppose the new UGC draft regulations on appointing Vice-Chancellors (VCs).
Claim that these regulations undermine the federal structure, State legislatures, and university autonomy.
Concerns Over Selection of VCs:
New structure: Selection committee will include Chancellor (Governor in state universities), UGC Chairman, and University syndicate/Senate.
The Chancellor (Governor) to appoint VCs from a shortlist, reducing the role of State Higher Education Departments.
States argue this structure will centralize power, dilute academic standards, and limit access for marginalized students.
Political and Legal Implications:
Non-BJP States see it as an attempt to politicize and commercialize higher education.
Raises constitutional concerns:
Can central delegated legislation override plenary powers of State legislatures?
States plan to challenge UGC’s authority through a legal and political route.
Way Forward
Requires a balanced approach that respects State autonomy while maintaining academic integrity.
Need for consultative policymaking with States and universities to ensure inclusive and decentralized decision-making.
COMMENTS