Lokpal ruled that High Court judges fall under its jurisdiction as "public servants" under the Prevention of Corruption Act.
Supreme Court stayed the decision, citing concerns over judicial independence.
The Lokpal previously dismissed a corruption complaint against a former Chief Justice of India (CJI), stating that the Lokpal Act, 2013, does not cover apex court judges.
Legal and Constitutional Implications:
High Courts are statutory bodies under State laws, making their judges subject to the Lokpal Act.
Supreme Court, established by the Constitution, is not covered by the Lokpal Act.
The Veraswami judgment (1991) ruled that a CJI cannot be investigated without prior consultation with the judiciary.
Judicial Accountability Mechanism:
Current process: Complaints against judges are handled through an in-house procedure, initiated by the CJI or President.
Disciplinary actions include resignation, denial of judicial work, or transfer, but reasons are not disclosed.
Way Forward
Need for greater transparency in handling judicial corruption cases.
Expanding in-house procedures to include independent prosecution under judicial oversight.
Ensuring judicial independence while maintaining accountability.
COMMENTS