A new study suggests grass-fed beef isn't better for the climate than industrial beef.
Grass-fed cows grow slower and produce less meat per animal, requiring more animals to meet demand.
This results in similar or higher carbon emissions compared to industrial beef production.
While climate impact is similar, grass-fed beef may have other environmental and animal welfare benefits.
Deforestation for beef production, especially in expanding markets, is a major concern.
Some experts worry focusing only on emissions ignores other environmental factors like biodiversity and soil health.
The study raises questions about balancing beef production with plant-based alternatives.
Researchers suggest reducing overall beef consumption could allow localized benefits of grass-fed beef to outweigh higher emissions.
COMMENTS